Re: Sourceforge

From: Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>, Ned Lilly <ned(at)xtuple(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sourceforge
Date: 2015-05-29 05:21:30
Message-ID: 8FAF1235-420F-44E4-B1C1-B7FFF6473021@citusdata.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> On May 28, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> We don't have legal ability to restrict them period. We are BSD licensed. The best we can do is put up a PSA.

Today a coworker mused whether we could issue a C&D for misuse of trademark if it comes to that. Maybe?

> That said, SF doesn't have the traffic to harm us. I am not worried about it. We aren't a web browser or something "users" would download (like Gimp).

We came to the same conclusion at lunch today. I wondered aloud whether Oracle would ever extend their [shameful practices][1] to MySQL, and someone pointed out that it’s probably only worthwhile to do so for apps likely to be installed on end-user machines. Adware in server software is not going to pay off.

I saw [at least one project][2] which retained control over its SF account but rather than deleting it just turned off all read access. Might be a possibility.

[1]: http://www.zdnet.com/article/oracle-extends-its-adware-bundling-to-include-java-for-macs/
[2]: https://twitter.com/OOLua/status/603908660264316928

--
Jason Petersen
Software Engineer | Citus Data
303.736.9255
jason(at)citusdata(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2015-05-29 06:18:58 Re: Sourceforge
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-05-29 02:08:29 Re: Sourceforge