| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ancient Binary versions ... |
| Date: | 2007-04-29 19:51:53 |
| Message-ID: | 8F500A4CE0C23890D84BDB55@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 20:08:15 +0100 Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Is there a reason why we are keeping them? Is it not sufficient to keep
>> just the latest minor version along a branch? ie. keep 7.2.8, remove 7.2.7
>> and earlier?
>
> I think we should keep the source tarballs, but I see no reason to keep the
> binaries.
Oh ya, we have source that goes back to the v1.x days ... :)
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFGNPdZ4QvfyHIvDvMRAqCAAJ9yTgjXdv4vdXelR0nvAyKn2pU/nwCgqEli
WqiiwXzB4fseSmBS+9se1Hw=
=hgNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-29 20:15:59 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-04-29 19:30:36 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |