RE: regressplans failures

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: regressplans failures
Date: 2000-11-23 00:58:53
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31AD@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> I'm guessing this is a variant of the problem Philip
> >> Warner reported yesterday. Probably WAL-related. Vadim?
>
> > Probably, though I don't understand how WAL is related to
> > execution plans. Ok, it's easy to reproduce - I'll take a look.
>
> Could just be a question of a different pattern of table accesses?
> Let me know if you want help looking...

Fixed - fdstate was not properly setted in fd.c:fileNameOpenFile
with WAL enabled, sorry.

Philip, please try to reproduce crash.

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-11-23 00:59:26 Re: pg_dump / Unique constraints
Previous Message jmscott 2000-11-22 23:59:08 Re: Table/Column Constraints