| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'The Hermit Hacker'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: WAL status update |
| Date: | 2000-10-31 21:04:15 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D85@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I believe that its just resting on Vadim again to give us the go ahead
> ... which I believe its always been on his shoulders, no? :)
>
> Vadim?
I think that at least 1 & 2 from WAL todo (checkpoints and port to
machines without TAS) is required before beta. As well as more testing...
Did anyone else test WAL recovery?
Sorry guys but I can't do both testing and coding at the same time.
WAL is the most complex thing I've ever did in project.
MVCC was just child's game.
Tom & Bruce are in summit anyway - let's wait them. And I'll do 1 & 2 in
a few days.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Kernell | 2000-10-31 21:36:26 | Re: Restricting permissions on Unix socket |
| Previous Message | KuroiNeko | 2000-10-31 21:03:38 | Re: how good is PostgreSQL |