| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'Martin A(dot) Marques'" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: backup and restore |
| Date: | 2000-10-12 23:34:00 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D4C@SECTORBASE1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Could this be added? I am willing to help with the coding.
>
> This is what Version 7.1 WAL is all about.
> There might be some help wanted in one of the possible backup methods:
> 1. a pg_dumpall restore, and a subsequent restore of logs
> 2. a restore of a "physical backup of db files" +
> subsequent restore of logs
>
> I think Vadim has the 1st way in his works.
No, 2nd. WAL reflects layout of tuples in data files, so I don't see
how pg_dump output could be used.
I'll really appreciate if someone will help with this issue ... after
alpha testing will start next week.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-13 01:53:15 | Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open |
| Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-10-12 23:27:48 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: postgresql 7.1 |