RE: More Performance

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: More Performance
Date: 2000-05-25 14:31:35
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C00@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Here I must slightly disagree, if the impact of vacuum
> without analyze is so bad, then analyze should be the
> default for vacuum.

*Must not* - it takes long time. Imho, there should be
ANALYZE command, with ACCESS SHARE lock...

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael A. Olson 2000-05-25 14:41:08 Re: AW: Berkeley DB...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-25 13:42:48 Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions