| From: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel |
| Date: | 2018-10-09 23:17:44 |
| Message-ID: | 8EC873C1-8102-4055-97BF-13F7D81F29DE@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Oct 9, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> In-Reply-To: <20180928223240(dot)kgwc4czzzekrpsid(at)alap3(dot)anarazel(dot)de>
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed below (at [1]), I think we should remove $subject. I plan
> to do so, unless somebody protests soon-ish. I thought it'd be better
> to call attention to this in a new thread, to make sure people had a
> chance to object.
I have no objection, but I'm curious, when retiring a datatype and
associated functions, do the Oids that were assigned to them become
available for new uses, or do you have to expire them to avoid breaking
pg_upgrade and such? Retiring built-in types and functions seems
rare enough that I've not seen how this is handled before.
mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-10-09 23:27:06 | Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-10-09 23:00:14 | Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables |