From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Date: | 2006-08-16 04:22:43 |
Message-ID: | 8DD24398-22D0-4F0E-90F3-5ECFCFE19DDE@seespotcode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:29 , Tom Lane wrote:
> So my current take on this would be that the bug tracker
> would have to have a reasonable "output" email capability, but I'd not
> necessarily insist on being able to "input" to it by mail.
Setting aside the email in, how would people feel about Atom or RSS
feeds as an alternative for alerts of activity in the system?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-16 04:52:21 | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2006-08-16 03:54:00 | Enum proposal / design |