Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-16 04:22:43
Message-ID: 8DD24398-22D0-4F0E-90F3-5ECFCFE19DDE@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:29 , Tom Lane wrote:

> So my current take on this would be that the bug tracker
> would have to have a reasonable "output" email capability, but I'd not
> necessarily insist on being able to "input" to it by mail.

Setting aside the email in, how would people feel about Atom or RSS
feeds as an alternative for alerts of activity in the system?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-16 04:52:21 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Previous Message Tom Dunstan 2006-08-16 03:54:00 Enum proposal / design