| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |
| Date: | 2021-10-07 16:58:57 |
| Message-ID: | 8A646633-0E51-470E-AB16-366AAA89B00F@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Oct 6, 2021, at 10:48 PM, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark, thanks for this work. I'm late to be here in this thread,
> please note that I didn't go through the entire thread as it is quite
> long for me to read.
Thanks for joining.
> I have a question: it looks like the view pg_backend_memory_contexts
> and the function pg_log_backend_memory_contexts are superuser only.
> Isn't it a good idea to allow users with a pg_monitor or some other
> similar role to use these as well? This question may be unrelated here
> but I'm curious to know whether your patch set has a solution.
Possibly, but I have stopped adding new topics to this particular patch set, as I'm already getting requests to break it into separate sets and email threads.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-10-07 17:09:44 | Re: storing an explicit nonce |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-10-07 16:57:12 | Re: storing an explicit nonce |