Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date: 2017-03-30 09:13:08
Message-ID: 899c23c3-372a-481f-468a-c070e22e46d9@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/03/30 18:02, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> This should be added to the open items list. I am not able to add it
> myself, as I don't have "editor" privileges on open items wiki. I have
> requested for those privileges.

I am going to shortly, after I reply to Shinoda-san's report. While the
crash can be fixed with a simple patch, I think we need to consider a
bigger question of whether ON CONFLICT processing on leaf partitions
should really occur. Commit 8355a011a0 enabled specifying ON CONFLICT DO
NOTHING on when inserting into a partitioned root table, but I think we
might need to reconsider.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vinayak 2017-03-30 09:19:22 Re: ANALYZE command progress checker
Previous Message Rushabh Lathia 2017-03-30 09:12:00 Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0