Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only
Date: 2025-05-20 21:01:11
Message-ID: 899041.1747774871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-05-20 16:18:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm curious though: what was the test case you were looking at?

> It's a modified query from our regression tests, I had added some debugging to
> find cases where the targetlists differed. I attached the extracted, somewhat
> modified, sql script.

[ confused... ] I get the same output from that script with or
without the patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-05-20 21:04:56 Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only
Previous Message Bennie Swart 2025-05-20 20:59:12 Re: Join removal and attr_needed cleanup