From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |
Date: | 2021-04-22 02:15:07 |
Message-ID: | 898412.1619057707@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2021-04-21 21:21:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I'm doing is running the core regression tests with a single
>> standby (on the same machine) and wal_consistency_checking = all.
> Do you run them over replication, or sequentially by storing data into
> an archive? Just curious, because its so painful to run that scenario in
> the replication case due to the tablespace conflicting between
> primary/standby, unless one disables the tablespace tests.
No, live over replication. I've been skipping the tablespace test.
> Have you tried reproducing it on commits before the recent xlogreader
> changes?
Nope.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-04-22 02:19:40 | Re: Stale description for pg_basebackup |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-04-22 01:59:58 | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |