Re: ranlib bleating about dirmod.o being empty

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: ranlib bleating about dirmod.o being empty
Date: 2015-03-17 16:51:55
Message-ID: 8975.1426611115@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> It looks like ar isn't even the preferred method to build static
> libraries on OS X anymore. Instead, one should use libtool (not GNU
> libtool), which has a -no_warning_for_no_symbols option.

I looked into this a little bit, but that option seems to be a somewhat
recent innovation; at least the libtool on my 10.6 (Snow Leopard)
buildfarm critter doesn't recognize it. We might be able to adopt it
in a couple more years when nobody cares about such old OS X releases.
In the meantime, though, reclassifying dirmod.o solves the problem
so I don't feel a need to have an argument about dropping support for
old releases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-03-17 17:03:03 Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-17 16:47:07 Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit