Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows
Date: 2006-01-19 20:54:21
Message-ID: 8964.1137704061@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What about the question of whether $(DESTDIR) belongs there or not?
>> I think we had concluded that PGXS shouldn't ever use $(DESTDIR),
>> because that's only for install-time stuff.

> I considered that a separate issue and didn't explore it, but I think
> you are right that $(DESTDIR) makes no sense so I will remove it.

> Patch attached.

If these are bogus then so are the uses in Makefile.aix and
Makefile.darwin.

I'm a bit bothered by the ones in pgxs.mk, too, although I suspect we
have to leave those there for the benefit of contrib?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message uwcssa 2006-01-19 20:54:33 Re: un-vacuum?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-19 20:51:13 Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-19 21:18:12 Re: Uninstall scripts for contrib
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-19 20:51:13 Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows