| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM |
| Date: | 2022-08-16 11:43:31 |
| Message-ID: | 894AEB23-270C-4058-BB31-B5B46CAF7C12@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 16 Aug 2022, at 13:40, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 5:06 PM Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
>> I went with sigexit_handler since pg_recvlogical has also a
>> sighup_handler and "sig_handler" would be confusing there.
>
> Can we move these signal handlers to streamutil.h/.c so that both
> pg_receivewal and pg_recvlogical can make use of it avoiding duplicate
> code?
In general that's a good idea, but they are so trivial that I don't really see
much point in doing that in this particular case.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2022-08-16 11:44:52 | Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-08-16 11:40:54 | Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM |