Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Date: 2009-10-05 08:46:29
Message-ID: 894A9463E685BC887A8A611A@[172.26.14.62]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 4. Oktober 2009 21:37:45 -0400 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> This is the last I remember hearing of it, which seems to suggest that
> only a week's worth of work (maybe a bit more for those of us who are
> not Tom Lane) is needed:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg01746.php
>
> But maybe you have some other thoughts?

The reason i didn't spent any time on this, is because i'm not sure that
following the "Rules" path is the way to go. As Peter mentioned, an
alternative (and pretty much the same way like other databases do), is to
figure out how triggers on views can handle this.

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-10-05 08:59:31 Re: Privileges and inheritance
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2009-10-05 08:39:59 Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal