Re: Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements
Date: 2018-03-21 17:31:32
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Vik,

On 3/10/18 9:02 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I've looked at this patch today. I like the idea / intent in general, as
> it helps with some investigation tasks. That being said, I have a couple
> of questions/comments based on read through the patch:

It looks like there are some privacy concerns with this patch as well as
the suggestions in the review from Tomas.

Will you be providing an updated patch for this CF? If not, I think we
should mark the entry Returned with Feedback for now and let you
resubmit when you have an updated patch.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-21 17:33:34 Re: reorganizing partitioning code
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2018-03-21 17:30:08 Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations