Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> On 7/2/20 5:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I still can't get excited about contorting the code to remove that
>> issue.
> It doesn't seem much worse than the oom test that was there before -- see attached.
Personally I would not bother, but it's your patch.
> Are we in agreement that whatever gets pushed should be backpatched through pg11
> (see start of thread)?
OK by me.
regards, tom lane