Re: Sorting by an arbitrary criterion

From: Alexander Staubo <alex(at)bengler(dot)no>
To: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sorting by an arbitrary criterion
Date: 2009-07-09 16:39:15
Message-ID: 88daf38c0907090939l68cd97dak38360473e6ffd9e8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Craig James<craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> wrote:
> Suppose I have a large table with a small-cardinality CATEGORY column (say,
> categories 1..5).  I need to sort by an arbitrary (i.e. user-specified)
> mapping of CATEGORY, something like this:
>
>  1 => 'z'
>  2 => 'a'
>  3 => 'b'
>  4 => 'w'
>  5 => 'h'
>
> So when I get done, the sort order should be 2,3,5,4,1.

If the object is to avoid a separate table, you can do it with a
"case" statement:

select ... from ...
order by case category
when 1 then 'z'
when 2 then 'a'
when 3 then 'b'
when 4 then 'w'
when 5 then 'h'
end

If you this sounds slow, you're right. But it might perform well
enough for your use case.

A.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-09 17:02:31 Re: Huge difference in query performance between 8.3 and 8.4 (possibly)
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-09 16:39:04 Re: Sorting by an arbitrary criterion