Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished

From: "Alexander Staubo" <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Alban Hertroys" <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
Date: 2007-08-24 21:49:35
Message-ID: 88daf38c0708241449q2e4fb3dfx17a6cab7c5d7f650@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 8/24/07, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Alban Hertroys wrote:
> > So actually the remark shouldn't be that "the multi-threaded
> > architecture is only advantageous on Windows", but more like "the
> > multi-process architecture is disadvantageous on Windows and hence a
> > multi-threaded architecture is preferred (on that particular OS)".
>
> Yeah - but I'm not sure thats necessarily something that should have a
> place on a bullet point comparison.

You solve it by letting the category be labeled "Process/thread
architecture", and letting the columns say "Thread-based" for Firebird
and "Process-based" for PostgreSQL respectively.

Then add a footnote about this row that explains the difference and
how they behave on the different operating systems.

PostgreSQL clearly is at a slight disadvantage on Windows, so this is
relevant, at least to Tony's Delphi-user demographic.

Alexander.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-24 21:52:40 Re: lc_collate issue
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2007-08-24 21:28:59 Re: Add Column BEFORE/AFTER another column