Re: Slightly OT.

From: "Alexander Staubo" <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net" <gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net>, "Guillaume Lelarge" <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "Kenneth Downs" <ken(at)secdat(dot)com>, nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slightly OT.
Date: 2007-06-01 15:13:33
Message-ID: 88daf38c0706010813t237e85a4r9d9b0569b7a86731@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/1/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > In the meantime, Cybertec (http://www.postgresql.at/, an Austrian
> > company) just announced a commercial synchronous multimaster
> > replication product based on 2-phase commit. It's expensive, and I
[snip]
> I could be completely cranked but I believe that product is based on
> PgCluster which is horrendously slow.

Well, dang, that's disappointing. Last I checked, the PGCluster design
was fundamentally unscalable.

Alexander.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-06-01 15:27:11 Re: Slightly OT.
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2007-06-01 15:11:30 Re: warm standby server stops doing checkpointsafterawhile