| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Allow an extention to be updated without a script |
| Date: | 2023-01-30 21:05:52 |
| Message-ID: | 888061.1675112752@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Currently, even when we don't need to execute any command to update an
> extension from one version to the next, we need to provide an update
> script that doesn't contain any command. Preparing such meaningless
> files are sometimes annoying.
If you have no update script, why call it a new version? The point
of extension versions is to distinguish different states of the
extension's SQL objects. We do not consider mods in underlying C code
to justify a new version.
> The attached patch introduces a new option "updates_without_script"
> into extension control file. This specifies a list of such updates
> following the pattern 'old_version--target_version'.
This seems completely unnecessary and confusing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2023-01-30 21:12:31 | Re: postgres_fdw, dblink, and CREATE SUBSCRIPTION security |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2023-01-30 21:02:04 | Re: Authentication fails for md5 connections if ~/.postgresql/postgresql.{crt and key} exist |