Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Date: 2016-08-02 19:43:45
Message-ID: 886a3377-9f2d-2176-15f7-b9ac1eb4dce7@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/02/2016 02:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> My guess is that the bytes are there to detect problems where
> a 512-byte disk sector is zeroed by a disk failure.

Does that seem plausible? (a) there is only one such header for
every 16 512-byte disk sectors, so it only affords a 6% chance of
detecting a zeroed sector, and (b) the header contains other
non-zero values in fields other than xlp_pageaddr, so the use
of a fixed value for _that field_ in zeroed tail blocks would
not prevent (or even reduce the 6% probability of) detecting
a sector zeroed by a defect.

-Chap

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-08-02 19:46:48 Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-08-02 19:13:55 Re: TODO item: Implement Boyer-Moore searching in LIKE queries