Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2024-01-24 16:32:58
Message-ID: 88518c81-dcdc-4c5b-9200-146b74a520ab@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18.01.24 04:59, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> Here are new patches consolidating feedback from several emails.

I have committed 0001 and 0002 (the primary key support).

The only significant tweak I did was the error messages in
GetOperatorFromWellKnownStrategy(), to make the messages translatable
better and share wording with other messages. These messages are
difficult to reach, so we'll probably have to wait for someone to
actually encounter them to see if they are useful.

I would like to work on 0003 and 0004 (the foreign key support) during
February/March. The patches beyond that are probably too optimistic for
PG17. I recommend you focus getting 0003/0004 in good shape soon.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-01-24 16:44:54 Re: s_lock_test no longer works
Previous Message Tristan Partin 2024-01-24 16:23:45 Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0