Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces
Date: 2004-03-03 05:36:38
Message-ID: 8850.1078292198@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
>> symlinks.

> Agreed, but are we going to support non-tablespace installs? I wasn't
> sure that was an option.

A setup containing only the default tablespace cannot use any symlinks.
That doesn't seem hard though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-03-03 08:14:31 Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-03 05:33:51 Re: Out of space situation and WAL log pre-allocation (was Tablespaces)

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2004-03-03 10:00:07 Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2004-03-03 05:25:12 Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces