Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Florin Irion <irionr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal
Date: 2021-10-01 04:27:41
Message-ID: 884615753acb5e080669ea6cb3b9e53daf01f562.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 18:26 -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 09/30/21 17:54, Florin Irion wrote:
> > We could also help users get a warning if they set a parameter with the
> > `SET` command.
>
> So I am in favor of patching this.

+1 on the idea.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2021-10-01 04:28:38 Re: non-superusers are allowed to drop the replication user, but are not allowed to alter or even create them, is that ok?
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2021-10-01 04:26:11 Re: non-superusers are allowed to drop the replication user, but are not allowed to alter or even create them, is that ok?