| From: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_service.conf |
| Date: | 2006-02-19 16:12:15 |
| Message-ID: | 87zmkns4yo.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Mark Woodward wrote:
>> Don't get me wrong, DNS, as it is designed, is PERFECT for the
>> distributed nature of the internet, but replication of fairly static
>> data under the control of a central authority (the admin) is better.
>
> What about this zeroconf/bonjour stuff? I'm not familiar with it, but
> it sounds like it could tie into this discussion.
That's a possibility, but I think it's hard to make it work outside a
single LAN (as in, it's not zero-conf anymore :) because it relies on
broadcasts.
-Doug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Douglas McNaught | 2006-02-19 16:15:46 | Re: pg_service.conf |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-19 16:10:45 | Re: pg_service.conf |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Douglas McNaught | 2006-02-19 16:15:46 | Re: pg_service.conf |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-19 16:10:45 | Re: pg_service.conf |