| From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
| Date: | 2010-11-03 16:52:31 |
| Message-ID: | 87zktqs628.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
> In general, I think the more efficient way to address this overall
> problem is to run the resulting HTML through tidy and be done with it.
+1. I use similar toolchain for my own web site, and one of the steps
is to run tidy on the output, which rectifies a number of issues. (I
haven't looked at just what they are in some years now :-))
--
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/slony.html
No lusers were harmed in the creation of this usenet article. AND I
WANT TO KNOW WHY NOT!
-- glmar0(at)twirl(dot)mcc(dot)ac(dot)uk in alt.sysadmin.recovery
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2010-11-03 22:59:58 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-03 15:35:34 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |