Re: Excessive disk usage in WindowAgg

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Excessive disk usage in WindowAgg
Date: 2019-11-04 19:04:52
Message-ID: 87zhhblazw.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:

>>> Obviously we _do_ need to be more picky about this; it seems clear
>>> that using CP_SMALL_TLIST | CP_LABEL_TLIST would be a win in many
>>> cases. Opinions?

>> Seems reasonable to me, do you want to do the honors?

Andres> I was briefly wondering if this ought to be backpatched. -0
Andres> here, but...

Uh, it seems obvious to me that it should be backpatched?

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-11-04 19:06:19 Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-11-04 19:04:40 Re: Missed check for too-many-children in bgworker spawning