Re: improvements to SGML

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improvements to SGML
Date: 2003-12-12 21:02:46
Message-ID: 87y8thpx55.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Looks good, but did you have a specific reason to prefer LOCK TABLE over
> plain LOCK?

None other than consistency: the majority of the usages in lock.sgml
already used LOCK TABLE, so I converted the rest over. I don't
particularly prefer one form over another...

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-12-12 21:34:30 Re: make "wal_debug" GUC var a boolean
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-12-12 19:27:14 Re: make "wal_debug" GUC var a boolean