Re: Questions about warnings

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions about warnings
Date: 2007-01-25 13:20:10
Message-ID: 87y7nrb5v9.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:

> I won't claim to know the inners good enough to comment on it. Does
> "const char **" really mean that the point is const, or the pointer that
> it points to is const?

"const char **" means the character at the end of the pointer chain is
constant. Which means my previous message is misguided, ignore it, sorry. In
short, yes, this is a limitation of the const syntax in C and you have to cast
it away in this case.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-01-25 13:23:27 Re: Recursive Queries
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-25 13:18:57 Re: Questions about warnings