| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, final patch |
| Date: | 2007-07-03 10:04:55 |
| Message-ID: | 87y7hx4xbs.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> For 8.3, we should probably just do some simple compensation in the checkpoint
> throttling code, if we want to do anything at all. But this is something to
> think about in the future.
Just as a stress test it might be interesting to run a quick tpcc test with
very short checkpoint intervals. Something like 30s. Just to make sure that
the logic is all correct and unexpected things don't start happening.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-03 13:56:42 | Re: [DOCS] rename of a view |
| Previous Message | Jacob Rief | 2007-07-03 10:02:35 | Re: SPI-header-files safe for C++-compiler |