Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Date: 2002-08-26 20:29:15
Message-ID: 87wuqdnz38.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> This is an improved version of the PL/PgSQL table function patch.

Here's another improved patch. I got the parser to accept 'RETURN
NEXT' properly (thanks to Frank Ch. Eigler @ RH for his help),
although the solution might not be perfect: I changed the scanner to
accept 'return next' as a single token (allowing for a variable amount
of whitespace between the first and second words, of course). If you
have a better suggestion, let me know.

I also improved some unrelated areas of the documentation a little bit
and made some minor code cleanups.

I'd like to see this patch get into 7.3beta1 -- AFAIK, the only thing
remaining to be done is to write the docs. If I need to do anything
else, let me know.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

Attachment Content-Type Size
plpgsql-srf-28.patch text/x-patch 47.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-08-26 20:49:07 Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-26 20:03:10 Re: Fix disabled triggers with deferred constraints