Re: off-topic: SPAM

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: off-topic: SPAM
Date: 2008-04-24 22:41:09
Message-ID: 87wsmm6flm.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance pgsql-www

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:

> 'k, just checked and yes, we have blocked one Brazil domain in the past because
> of this issue:
>
> subscribe
> deny, reason="uol.com.br requires non-spam confirmation .. "
> /@uol.com.br/i || /Moniquechristien(at)cs(dot)com/i
>
> So we could add similar ... but, the question comes back to if they have a spam
> confirmation required, how is email getting to them in order to subscribe them
> in the first place? The only way I can think of is that this is a feature that
> has been added *since* they registered ...

What does uol.com.br have to do with infotecnica.com.br? Are you sure this
wasn't a similar but unrelated case?

Another possible answer to the question is that someone was frustrated by the
ban and subscribed at a different address then forwarded the mail.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2008-04-25 00:06:01 Planner won't use composite index if there is an order by ????
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-04-24 22:00:11 Re: off-topic: SPAM

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-04-25 01:09:49 Re: off-topic: SPAM
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-04-24 22:00:11 Re: off-topic: SPAM