From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Loïc Vaumerel <shefla(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Autonomous transaction |
Date: | 2010-04-06 11:35:49 |
Message-ID: | 87wrwk3jai.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Loïc Vaumerel <shefla(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> All solutions I found are working the same way : they use dblink.
> I consider these solution more as handiwork than a clean solution.
> I am a little bit concerned about side effects as dblink were not
> intially designed for this.
See plproxy which is designed for this kind of work. Or about…
> Is there a way to use real and clean autonomous transactions in
> PostgreSQL yet ?
None that I know of.
> If no, is it planned to do so ? When ?
We get demands quite often, it seems it's one of the "big tickets" we're
still missing. I don't remember any development effort proposal, though.
Regards,
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-06 11:39:20 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-06 11:30:31 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per |