Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq

From: Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Date: 2012-02-24 13:16:53
Message-ID: 87wr7cxtfe.fsf@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de> writes:

> * Alex Shulgin:
>
>> Yeah, this is really appealing, however how do you tell if the part
>> after the last slash is a socket directory name or a dbname? E.g:
>>
>> psql postgres:///path/to/different/socket/dir (default dbname)
>> psql postgres:///path/to/different/socket/dir/other (dbname=other ?)
>
> The HTTP precent is to probe the file system until you find something.
> Most HTTP servers have something similar to the PATH_INFO variable which
> captures trailing path segments.
>
> It's ugly, but it's standard practice, and seems better than a separate
> -d parameter (which sort of defeats the purpose of URIs).

Hm, do you see anything what's wrong with "?dbname=other" if you don't
like a separate -d?

--
Alex

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2012-02-24 13:18:44 Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Previous Message Florian Weimer 2012-02-24 13:07:21 Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq