Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date: 2004-08-01 23:22:49
Message-ID: 87vfg2wiie.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Huh? That is exactly counter to most people's expectations about
> version numbering. N.0 is the unstable release, N.1 is the one
> with some bugs shaken out. If we release a 7.5 people will expect
> it to be less buggy than 7.4, and I'm not sure we can promise that.

I agree with this, and from my non-authoritative viewpoint as a user
and rabid advocate, I think we should be going with 8.0 for this
release as well. :)

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-01 23:52:38 Re: missing link on ftp
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-08-01 23:17:47 Just a quick 'downtime' notice