"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> The ODBC API (defined by Microsoft of course) includes a number of *W
> functions which are Unicode variants of the ANSI versions with the same
> name.
I think one extra layer of confusion is added by the fact that POSIX
defines the type wchar_t as "the abstract/platform-dependent
character", W just meaning here: "W like Wide enough", whereas
Microsoft defines WCHAR as: "W like Unicode". Microsoft's abstract
character being "TCHAR".
Am I right here?