Re: @ versus ~, redux

From: Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: @ versus ~, redux
Date: 2006-09-04 11:46:37
Message-ID: 87veo326si.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com> writes:
>
> > Tom Lane ha scritto:
> > >
> > > "x @< y" means "x is contained in y"
> >
> > ltree <@ ltree
>
> If you consider ltree entries to be sets containing all their children then
> those sound consistent.

Oops, sorry for the noise.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-09-04 11:56:58 Re: autoconf version for back branches?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-09-04 11:35:42 Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project