Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> writes:

Andreas> I believe I have fixed these except for the comment on the
Andreas> conditions for when we inline.

Andreas> Andrew Gierth: Why did you chose to not inline on FOR UPDATE
Andreas> but inline volatile functions? I feel that this might be
Andreas> inconsistent since in both cases the query in the CTE can
Andreas> change behavior if the planner pushes a WHERE clause into the
Andreas> subquery, but maybe I am missing something.

I chose not to inline FOR UPDATE because it was an obvious compatibility
break, potentially changing the set of locked rows, and it was an easy
condition to test.

I did not test for volatile functions simply because this was a very
early stage of the project (which wasn't my project, I was just
assisting someone else). I left the comment "this likely needs some
additional checks" there for a reason.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)