Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Date: 2007-06-14 10:49:45
Message-ID: 87tztax12u.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

>> Attached is a small patch which adds this conditionally on a guc that
>> pg_admin or other GUI tools could set, leaving it unchanged for users.
>
> That makes things *worse* not better, since now tools would have to
> deal with both possibilities.

I was thinking tools would set the guc before issuing an EXPLAIN they planned
to parse.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-06-14 11:12:40 Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-06-14 09:07:07 Re: DROP TABLE and autovacuum