Re: Best suiting OS

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, Jean-Michel Pouré <jmpoure(at)free(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS
Date: 2009-10-12 15:26:44
Message-ID: 87tyy4bpl7.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
>> If you want the latest and greatest, then you can use Debian testing.
>
> testing and sid are usually the same with a 15 days delay.

And receive no out-of-band security updates, so you keep the holes for
3 days when lucky, and 10 to 15 days otherwise, when choosing
testing. So consider stable first, and if you like to be in danger every
time you dist-upgrade while *having* to do it each and every day, sid is
for your production servers.

> I strongly suggets to have a debian lenny and to backport newer packages if
> really required (like postgres 8.4). Debian come with good tools to achieve
> that (and there is debian-backport repository, sure)

stable + backports + volatile (when it makes sense) is a perfect choice :)
--
dim

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tory M Blue 2009-10-12 19:06:37 Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-10-12 15:10:51 Re: Query performance