Re: Function parameter names

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function parameter names
Date: 2003-11-26 02:52:21
Message-ID: 87smkbu9i2.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> It's strange to allow identifiers to be of any length in the system
> table when there is no way to create it using normal syntax.

I agree with Tom -- that doesn't seem strange to me at all.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-11-26 04:25:34 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-26 01:29:14 Re: A rough roadmap for internationalization fixes