Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData
Date: 2018-12-14 23:33:12
Message-ID: 87sgyzy9dp.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:

>> I think it'd probably good to add accessors for value/nullness in
>> arguments that hide the difference between <v12 and v12, for the
>> sake of extension authors. Would probably mostly make sense if we
>> backpatched those for compatibility.

Speaking as an affected extension author: don't backpatch them.

The extension code has to cope with being compiled against a minor
release that doesn't have the backpatch, so the extension author has to
do their own workaround anyway. Having additional conditions based on
the minor release is just more pain.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-14 23:56:27 Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-12-14 23:32:01 Re: valgrind issues on Fedora 28