Re: [INTERFACES] yet another postgresql interface

From: Aleksey Demakov <avd(at)gcom(dot)ru>
To: Sergio <ser(at)perio(dot)unlp(dot)edu(dot)ar>
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] yet another postgresql interface
Date: 1999-01-13 08:01:32
Message-ID: 87r9szob37.fsf@avd.gcom.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Sergio <ser(at)perio(dot)unlp(dot)edu(dot)ar> writes:

> >I dubbed it pguile.
>
> what about libpqguile ?,
> so we have libpq, libpq++, libpqguile, libpq*
>
> IMO pguile is too generic.

Hmm... Probably, you are right. The name pguile is bad.
I'll change it to guile-pgsql. Most guile extensions are
called this way (guile-gtk, guile-tcltk, guile-hobbit).

--
Aleksey Demakov
avd(at)gcom(dot)ru

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sferacarta Software 1999-01-13 13:44:28 Re[2]: [INTERFACES] PSQLODBC and TRANSACTIONS
Previous Message Byron Nikolaidis 1999-01-12 15:55:23 Re: [INTERFACES] PSQLODBC and TRANSACTIONS