| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Henrik Steffen" <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
| Date: | 2002-11-09 18:56:33 |
| Message-ID: | 87r8dua7xa.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
"Henrik Steffen" <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de> writes:
> will an upgrade to a dual processor machine
> noticeably increase performance of a postgresql server?
Assuming you have more than 1 concurrent client, it likely
will. Whether it will be a huge performance improvement depends on the
other characteristics of the workload (e.g. is it I/O bound or CPU
bound?).
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-11-09 19:07:17 | Re: PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select |
| Previous Message | snpe | 2002-11-09 17:51:41 | PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Henrik Steffen | 2002-11-11 07:05:27 | Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-09 12:50:37 | Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? |