Re: pg_dump and inherits issue

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: jim(at)contactbda(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and inherits issue
Date: 2006-07-12 18:09:46
Message-ID: 87r70qk845.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> writes:

> The check constraints on table s are not like the original, I have an extra
> t_a_check constraint. Is this correct?

I wouldn't say it's correct but it is known.

I think the plan is to have such constraints be marked so you *can't* drop
them as long as you're a child of another table that has them. But Postgres
doesn't yet track where constraints came from or check that you don't drop
ones that are inherited.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Frost 2006-07-12 18:16:23 Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-07-12 17:24:57 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze