From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Seiderer <ps(dot)report(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: configure can't detect proper pthread flags |
Date: | 2015-03-20 18:51:25 |
Message-ID: | 87pp83h5e7.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Then maybe stderr tests should grep output for a specific option,
>> the one we're currently testing, not just any noise?
Robert> That sounds awfully fragile to me. It can't really be safe to
Robert> assume we know precisely what the warning messages will look
Robert> like.
But how safe is it to assume that a warning message about option '-foo'
will contain the string '-foo' in it somewhere?
(though the trace output from -x still should be dealt with separately)
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-20 19:15:07 | Order of enforcement of CHECK constraints? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-20 18:50:19 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |