| From: | Christian Barthel <bch(at)online(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rory Campbell-Lange <rory(at)campbell-lange(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication versus pglogical on PostgreSQL 14 |
| Date: | 2022-07-30 06:05:34 |
| Message-ID: | 87o7x7uocx.fsf@online.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday, July 23, 2022, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Is native logical replication and pglogical replication fundamentally
> the same?
Here is a discussion about the differences between pglogical 2.1 and
logical replication in PostgreSQL 10:
<https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/pglogical-logical-replication-postgresql-10/>
As far as I can tell, pglogical provides more features than the builtin
logical replication in PostgreSQL (row/column filtering as an example).
> Is pglogical likely to be continue to be supported?
The link above says so:
| First, let me assure you that the development of pglogical continues.
Furthermore, the last release is from Dec, 2021 and the last commit is
12 days ago, <https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pglogical>.
--
Christian Barthel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | howardnews | 2022-07-31 22:40:14 | Connecting to postgres on OSX from Swift using PostgresClientKit |
| Previous Message | Bryn Llewellyn | 2022-07-29 17:10:46 | Re: « The PL/pgSQL interpreter parses the function's source text and produces an internal binary instruction tree... » |