Re: Tab completion for large objects

From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tab completion for large objects
Date: 2025-10-24 10:04:05
Message-ID: 87o6pw8vl6.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 6:23 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The code change is solid. One tidy comment on the commit subject and message:
>
> I've updated the commit message as suggested and pushed the patch. Thanks!

Thanks!

- ilmari

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-10-24 10:09:37 Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical"
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-10-24 09:53:44 Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream